​
Source: Work with nutrition labeling & smarter people than me who deal with FDA food regulations
Also: https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/fda-foods-must-contain-what-label-says
I want to know why some nutritional labels omit nutrition by serving:
​
i.e. let’s say hypothetically a brownie serving is 67g
​
but the nutritional label completely omits the nutritional information for a serving (67g) and instead only lists it for 100g, the end result being I have to manually calculate anything that isn’t 100g.
Regulatory agencies are not checking every product that comes to market. There are too many. They will, however, check out a product if they are made aware of the incorrect description, and that the source of the claim has credible evidence.
There may be some watchdog groups out there that do independent product testing, but there are so many products, it’s not realistic to get them all.
Also, companies have some leeway when reporting numbers. Laws/politics play a huge role in this.
What about the’ South Hampton 6’ food colouring that is banned in Europe? If it’s sugar your worried about there’s really no sense in reading the labels. The FDA needs to ban these colour chemicals.
Labels are horseshit. Eat whole foods. A banana is 100% banana
I have always wondered this. They are allowed a margin of error, and they take full advantage of that. I forget the allowable give or take, i think it is around +-10%. So if they say it has 30g of sugar per serving, it may actually have 33g, and they know that.